
If you’ve ever sat through a training course or studied Learning and Development, you’ve probably come across Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. It’s been a staple of L&D for decades, appearing in countless presentations, textbooks, and courses. The idea that human needs form a pyramid, progressing from basic survival needs up to self-actualisation, is compelling. But here’s an interesting fact: Maslow never intended it for training.
While his work provides useful insight into human motivation, it wasn’t meant to be a framework for corporate learning and development. Yet, over the years, the L&D profession has adopted and repurposed it to explain learner engagement, motivation, and performance. And while there are elements that make sense – yes, people learn better when they feel safe and supported – the idea that corporate learning follows a strict, hierarchical structure doesn’t hold up in practice.
Real-world training doesn’t follow neat, hierarchical steps. It’s messy, dynamic, and unpredictable.
PRIME started as an idea based around what a trainer-centric version of Maslow’s hierarchy could look like, but as I scribbled ideas down it developed into something more as I wondered could I find a simple framework built specifically for trainers? One that was simple enough to be practical but structured enough to give trainers a solid foundation to work from. A model that didn’t force learning into a rigid hierarchy but instead recognised the realities of the workplace and how people truly engage with training.
The result? The PRIME framework.
Bookmark this page or sign up to be notified when the update is released